Zune Forum
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 18, 2013, 12:20:01 AM


Login with username, password and session length


Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Google Faces FTC's Largest Ever Fine, though hardly a deterrent  (Read 276 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
xune
Site Administrator
Admiral
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 19565



« on: July 27, 2012, 12:38:54 AM »

Quote
Google Faces FTC's Largest Ever Fine Over Safari Cookie Debacle
JUL 10, 2012 4:02 AM - Jamie Condliffe



Five months on from the Wall Street Journal spotting that Google was circumventing cookie privacy settings in Safari, the big G is now close to settling the matter with the FTC.

There's one bitter pill that still remains to be swallowed, though: the WSJ reports that Google is set to pony up $22.5 million, the FTC's largest ever fine.

As a quick refresher, the original problem was a result of sneaky cookie tactics used by Google. In February, we wrote:

The WSJ explains how Google has developed code that installs cookies on a users' device-without their permission-from adverts contained in web pages. Once installed, however, those cookies have potentially allowed Google to track browsing across the majority of websites.

Research by the WSJ showed that the code was present in adverts on Fandango.com, Match.com, AOL.com, TMZ.com and UrbanDictionary.com, among others, and that it worked on both desktop and mobile versions of Safari...

The code in question stems from the development of Google+, being developed to skirt the way Safari blocked an original implementation of the "+1" button on third-party websites. Instead of directly using cookies, which Safari doesn't allow without user consent, the code made Safari think that a person was submitting an invisible form to Google. Sneaky. Then, Google had free reign to add cookies-and track a user's browsing-without the user ever knowing.

Now, Google and the FTC are close to reaching an agreed settlement figure, reports the Journal. While the final sum is still to be approved by FTC commissioners, both the FTC and Google have in theory agreed to a fine of $22.5 million. If that figure gets the go-ahead, it will be the biggest ever issued by the FTC.

But while $22.5 million sounds like a lot, it's worth noting that Google made that much in revenue every 5 hours last year. Just how much of a deterrent is that, then?

[Wall Street Journal via Verge]

http://lifehacker.com/5924699/google-faces-ftcs-largest-ever-fine-over-safari-cookie-debacle?tag=security
« Last Edit: July 27, 2012, 12:44:48 AM by xune » Logged


uʍop ǝpısdn sʇı puɐ sıɥʇ buıpɐǝɹ ǝɹɐ noʎ
Radiation
Commander
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2905


« Reply #1 on: July 27, 2012, 07:02:52 AM »

Don't be evil... Cheesy
Logged
xune
Site Administrator
Admiral
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 19565



« Reply #2 on: August 11, 2012, 03:18:17 PM »

Quote
Google to pay $22.5 million to settle FTC charges over tracking cookies in Apple's Safari browser
By Mat Smith  posted Aug 9th 2012 at 11:11AM



Google has agreed to pay a $22.5 million penalty to settle its dispute with the FTC, over the company's role in bypassing browser settings in Apple's Safari web browser. Although it stated that it wouldn't use tracking cookies or targeted ads in the web browser, a loophole was discovered, violating a previous privacy settlement between the FTC and Google.

According to the commission, the company exploited an exception in the browser's default settings, adding a temporary cookie that could temporarily open up access to all cookies from the DoubleClick domain. While the exploit was patched by Google, for a limited time, it was able to track Safari users that had explicitly opted out.

http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/09/google-to-pay-22-5-million-ftc-cookies/
Logged


uʍop ǝpısdn sʇı puɐ sıɥʇ buıpɐǝɹ ǝɹɐ noʎ
Radiation
Commander
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2905


« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2012, 03:27:33 PM »

I like how the article says Google 'agreed' to pay. Like they have a choice?
Logged
xune
Site Administrator
Admiral
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 19565



« Reply #4 on: August 11, 2012, 03:30:05 PM »

Lol, true.
Logged


uʍop ǝpısdn sʇı puɐ sıɥʇ buıpɐǝɹ ǝɹɐ noʎ
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC

 

fire vs ipad

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM
Page created in 0.31 seconds with 21 queries.